User talk:Bri

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Category:Alonzo Victor Lewis

Why did you just remove Category:Alonzo Victor Lewis from a large number of his works? (E.g. [1]). - Jmabel ! talk 18:42, 19 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Ah, I see, attached that to the category for the set of sculptures. Got it. Sorry to bother you. - Jmabel ! talk 18:43, 19 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

TUSC token 74fcd559a3bde7c0000adce178d119c4

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Category:Krushynka_17-05-2013

hi! Can you rename all files to Category:Krushynka? From Category:Krushynka_17-05-2013 to just Category:Krushynka? I must to go tommorow, see you at 16 of Jule. Bye! thanks! ^-^ :-) --Nickispeaki (talk) 19:00, 2 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I added a bot command to do it here. - Brianhe (talk) 16:17, 3 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Olympia GMO protest, 2013

Hi. Shouldn't Category:Olympia GMO protest, 2013 be properly categorized as Category:March Against Monsanto Olympia under the parent category of Category:March Against Monsanto, 25 May 2013, in the United States? Viriditas (talk) 03:49, 6 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dick's

I see you created Category:Dick's Drive-In. You imply that Dick's in Spokane is related to the Seattle-are Dick's. Any basis for that? From what I remember (I haven't been in Spokane in almost 20 years) the menu is quite different, and I've never heard they are related. - Jmabel ! talk 06:20, 15 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nope, from what I can tell online, ownership is unrelated. Feel free to move it out of the category and/or rename the cat (maybe to Western Washington Dicks?). Brianhe (talk) 07:27, 16 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I don't think the category name needs to change: the Seattle area one is a prominent chain in a major city, referenced in a good number of local hip-hop lyrics, etc. The other is a single drive-in that happens to have the same name. - Jmabel ! talk 16:57, 16 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Heather Black's images

Hi Re Hannah Franklin's image etc. This is a photograph of a sculpture that I took. I review art for a newspaper in Canada and take photos of art which are then published, so my understanding that if I take a photograph I have copyright over the image, not the subject or object or artwork. That said, I don't pretend to be a lawyer and I don't know United States' law which may be different. If so, please let me know. Also as a new wikipedia editor that asks for help to improve my wikipedia entries, I would prefer if someone would contact me, tell me what the problem is, how to fix or delete it, and I would have done so in a flash. --HeatherBlack --HeatherBlack (talk) PS I'm sorry that I don't know how to sign this properly.

So if I take a picture of a piece of art now I own the copyright to it? If you think about this for a moment I think you will see how absurd it sounds. If you really don't understand when you have copyright to an item, you probably don't. Please read COM:CB before uploading more files. - Brianhe (talk) 02:22, 4 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for page reference. I now understand that although I own copyright to the photograph, I need permission from the artist because the object also has copyright. I had verbal permission from the artists to put these up. Do I need written? How can I change them or do they need to be deleted and reentered? Thanks HeatherBlack

You should get permission mailed into OTRS. Please continue to ask questions at Village pump, there is a link in the navigation box on the left side of the page. Brianhe (talk) 15:49, 4 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
In case it's not clear, by "OTRS" he means COM:OTRS. - Jmabel ! talk 16:38, 4 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected: 


--  Gazebo (talk) 12:38, 10 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Photo Seattle Commons draft plan, 1993.jpg

Please see my response there. - Jmabel ! talk 19:03, 7 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Glacial erratics

I've created Category:Parklet with glacial erratic, Wedgwood, Seattle, Washington. - Jmabel ! talk 22:49, 11 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Matthias Hentze - Picture

Hi Brianhe,

I'm fairly new here and tried to maintain Matthias' wiki article to my best knowledge. Please note that the portrait is from his private repertory and he made it available to the EMBL photolab for them to use it in their library of official photos. I've changed the source to "private". I'm not sure whether or not entering Matthias as "author" is alright. Please let me know if I can clarify anything else and thanks for your advice! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Princessella123 (talk • contribs)

Thank you for disclosing your relationship to the person photographed, here and elsewhere; however, I think the file should be deleted. Brianhe (talk) 07:30, 23 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Rhys Matthew Bond.jpg

Hi, if a file contains the blue OTRS template, it will be deleted after 30 days if a valid permission has still not been established. Please don't add additional DRs to such files. Jcb (talk) 22:18, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:AHersh Headshot.jpg

Hi Bri,

Thanks for your message re: this headshot. The photographer of this image is Matt Cohen, but he gave Allen Hershkowitz ownership and all rights to use it. Mr. Hershkowitz provided the image file to me with the request that I would update his previous photo with this one. Please let me know if there's any other verification you need from me, or him. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidbmuller (talk • contribs) 18:27, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Davidbmuller: Replying here is not going to accomplish anything. Please add your comments at the deletion page instead. Bri (talk) 22:35, 25 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Photo request

@Jmabel: 3045 64h Ave SW: [2][3] Seattle's oldest house. Would make a good addition to the architecture article on enwp. Bri (talk) 16:39, 31 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Andrew Hussie.jpg

File:Andrew Hussie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:38, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Seafair royalty

Here and similar: I'm not sure I agree with this edit. They are Seafair royalty (a category already given) but this is not a Seafair event. - Jmabel ! talk 23:55, 6 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No problem, I self reverted the one you identified. Bri (talk) 00:00, 7 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Emerald triangle land use changes Carah 2015.png

File:Emerald triangle land use changes Carah 2015.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Wcam (talk) 23:14, 21 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"Washington" categories

Unless it's a place name like Category:Lynnwood, Washington, please always use "Washington (state)" not just "Washington" in category names. Otherwise, it gets confused with D.C. Thanks! - Jmabel ! talk 04:52, 22 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Capitol Conservatory in Olympia C-SPAN.png

File:Capitol Conservatory in Olympia C-SPAN.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:25, 23 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely --- Coffeeandcrumbs 09:57, 24 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Q84497471 screen shot.png

File:Q84497471 screen shot.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Njzjz (talk) 06:31, 10 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File tagging File:May 2020 Seattle protest ES 4.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:May 2020 Seattle protest ES 4.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 11:55, 18 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Jmabel and A1Cafel: I was cc'ed on a properly filled out release sent by the photographer to permissions-commons dated Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 3:07 PM. They should not be deleted. Bri (talk) 18:36, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Were these marked as OTRS pending? - Jmabel ! talk 23:36, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Joe, oops no -- should I do it now? Bri (talk) 23:54, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Probably. @A1Cafel: , do you have any problem with Bri doing this and removing your deletion tags? I know him, and I'm sure he wouldn't be saying OTRS was in progress if it wasn't. - Jmabel ! talk 00:00, 20 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I went ahead and removed the "no permission" tags, hope this is all kosher. Is there any way for me to tell when the OTRS volunteers connect the email to these images? Bri (talk) 17:16, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Depends what the email says. You say you were cc'd. You can certainly clarify by responding on the thread and including the links, if that wasn't done in the first place. - Jmabel ! talk 22:24, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Done Bri (talk) 23:42, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Jmabel and A1Cafel: last followup, hopefully: just letting you know that OTRS ticket appears to have been linked to the images. This matter is closed now, I think. Bri (talk) 15:07, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:FBI seeking information poster Adreanna Anita Jackson.pdf

File:FBI seeking information poster Adreanna Anita Jackson.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:16, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Sonnie Johnson CPAC 2013.jpg

File:Sonnie Johnson CPAC 2013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 4 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Legality of cannabis in Ireland

Hi Bri! After doing research on the topic in relation to Ireland, there is a provision in the Misuse of Drugs Act 1977, Ireland has a special category in the act relating to cannabis, where all other drugs for a first offense, can give you jail terms, cannabis is given a 3 strike rule, where your first two offenses, are a warning for the first one, and then a fine for the second one, only upon a 3rd offense can you suffer any actual jail time, however only a portion of first and second offenses get written up. Therefore cannabis in Ireland appears to be in a semi-decriminalized state; it's given a 3 strike rule unlike every other substance, cannabis is treated specially, and in it's own category in the Misuse of Drugs Act 1977. In regards to the map, which you are a contributor too, I am not an experienced artist when it comes to Wikipedia commons, but the map should be updated to reflect this for Ireland, and I will update the table for Ireland when you are able to change the map. If you can help here, thank you! B. M. L. Peters (talk) 05:20, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • @B. M. L. Peters: you seem to be saying that a criminal offense with a mild penalty is somehow not a criminal offense. Am I missing something? - Jmabel ! talk 04:32, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • @Jmabel: No not at all, I'm stating that due to the unique status in which cannabis in Ireland is treated, compared to all other drugs, suggests the country prefers not to criminally prosecute the drug if possible, just leave off people with warnings and citations, to an extent. B. M. L. Peters (talk) 04:55, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion probably should be carried out at en:WT:WikiProject Cannabis where more people can contribute. Bri (talk) 18:14, 7 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]


The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:CBGA molecule.svg is disputed

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:CBGA molecule.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --DMacks (talk) 20:31, 21 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bri&oldid=562634835"